Chapter 8 — The Complete System: Integrating Rainwater, Greywater, Mains, and Storage

A complete residential water management system combines everything from the preceding chapters: rainwater collection, greywater recycling, storage, treatment, distribution, and a mains backup — all in a coherent architecture that is safe, reliable, legally compliant, and maintainable. This chapter provides the integration logic and works through three complete design examples.


8.1 System Architecture Patterns

Four principal architectures cover the range of residential applications:

Pattern A: Rainwater-Only (Off-Grid)

Roof → First-flush → Coarse screen → Tank → Treatment → Distribution
                                        ↓
                               Overflow → Soakaway/storm drain

Suitable for: Rural properties in moderate-to-high rainfall climates with no mains connection. Requires: Sufficient roof area and storage to meet 100% of demand; comprehensive treatment for potable use.

Pattern B: Rainwater + Mains Backup (Hybrid)

Roof → First-flush → Screen → Tank → Treatment → Non-potable distribution
                                 ↑
                      Mains top-up (air gap or float valve)

Mains supply ──────────────────────────────────────→ Potable distribution

The most common pattern for connected homes. Rainwater offsets a substantial fraction of mains use; mains fills the tank when rainwater is insufficient.

Pattern C: Greywater Reuse Only (Mains-Supplied Home)

Showers / Sinks → Greywater collection → Surge tank → Treatment → Toilet flushing / Irrigation
Washing machine ─┘

Mains supply → All potable uses

Suitable for: Urban homes without roof collection potential; apartment buildings; homes in water-restricted areas.

Pattern D: Full Integrated System

Roof → First-flush → Screen → Rainwater tank (primary) ─┐
                                                          ├→ Treatment → Non-potable supply
Showers / Sinks ──→ Greywater tank (secondary) ──────────┘

Mains top-up ─────────────────────────→ Rainwater tank (backup, via air gap)

Mains supply ─────────────────────────────────────────── Potable supply

Full integration maximises offset and provides redundancy. More complex to install and commission.


8.2 Source Switching Logic

In Pattern B and D systems, the system must decide when to draw from the rainwater tank vs. when to top up from mains. Two approaches:

Float Valve (Passive)

A float valve on the mains inlet to the rainwater tank automatically opens when the tank level drops below a set point (e.g., 20% of capacity), allowing mains water to fill to a minimum working level (e.g., 30%).

Solenoid Valve with Level Sensor (Active)

An electronic level sensor (float switch, ultrasonic, or pressure transducer) monitors tank level. A controller opens a solenoid valve on the mains top-up line when level drops below a threshold.

Trompe Valve (Break-Pressure Top-Up)

A trompe valve maintains an air gap between the mains inlet and the tank water surface at all times, regardless of tank level. Water trickles in continuously above the surface level. Elegant mechanical solution for regulatory compliance where air gap is required.


8.3 Overflow and Storm Management

Every tank must have an overflow. In heavy rain, the tank fills faster than demand can draw it down. Overflow must be:

Soakaway sizing: For a roof with a 50-year return period rainfall intensity of 75 mm/hour: Peak overflow rate = A × I = 80 m² × 75 mm/hr / 3,600 s/hr × 1,000 = 1.67 L/s

This is the design flow for the overflow pipe and the soakaway.


8.4 Control System Design

For automated systems, the control logic should be:

Rainwater pump:

Mains top-up:

Greywater system:

A simple Arduino or ESP32 microcontroller can manage these control loops with level sensors and relay-switched pumps for DIY implementations. Commercial pre-wired control units are also available.


8.5 Worked Design Example 1: Urban Terraced House

Inputs:

Design:

Toilet demand: 2 persons × 21 L/person/day = 42 L/day

Greywater from showers (2 × 8 min × 8 L/min = 128 L/day): Greywater available: 128 L/day » 42 L/day toilet demand. Greywater easily covers toilets.

Greywater system: Surge tank (200 L) + small pump to toilet cisterns. No treatment needed beyond lint filter if used only for toilet flushing.

Rainwater system (garden irrigation only):

System: Greywater surge tank (200 L) + pump + 200 L rainwater garden butt. Mains for all potable uses.

Mains offset: 42 L/day toilet saving = 15 m³/year ≈ 28% of total demand.


8.6 Worked Design Example 2: Suburban Detached House

Inputs:

Rainwater system sizing:

Non-potable demand (toilets + laundry): 84 + 35 = 119 L/day = 3,570 L/month

Monthly supply vs. demand (C = 0.85, A = 120 m²):

Month Rainfall (mm) Supply (L) Demand (L) Net (L)
Jan 74 7,548 3,570 +3,978
Jul 34 3,468 3,570 −102
Aug 43 4,386 3,570 +816

Annual supply: 120 × 792 × 0.85 = 80,784 L = 80.8 m³ Annual demand: 3,570 × 12 = 42,840 L = 42.8 m³ Annual supply (80.8 m³) far exceeds demand (42.8 m³) → System is supply-abundant; storage needed only to bridge the July/August shoulder period.

Rippl sizing: Maximum cumulative deficit across the year ≈ 3,000 L. With 20% safety factor: Tank = 3,600 L → use 4,000 L HDPE tank.

Mains top-up for July/August shortfall only.

Greywater garden system:

Mains offset: 42.8 m³/year from rainwater ≈ 20% of total ~219 m³/year demand.


8.7 Worked Design Example 3: Rural Off-Grid Property

Inputs:

Collection potential:

Annual yield: 200 × 900 × 0.88 = 158,400 L = 158.4 m³ Annual total demand (4 persons × 150 L/day × 365): 219,000 L = 219 m³

Annual supply < annual demand. Demand reduction is essential.

With demand reduction measures (low-flow showerheads, dual-flush, efficient washing machine): Revised demand: 4 × 100 L/day × 365 = 146 m³/year

Supply/demand ratio: 158.4 / 146 = 1.08 — marginally surplus.

Storage sizing (Rippl method for borderline system):

Driest period: May–July, ~45 mm/month Monthly supply = 200 × 45 × 0.88 = 7,920 L Monthly demand = 146,000 / 12 = 12,167 L Monthly deficit: −4,247 L Three-month cumulative deficit: ~12,750 L

With 25% safety factor: Tank = 16,000 L → use 2 × 10,000 L underground concrete tanks (manifolded).

Treatment train (potable): Roof → First-flush diverter (200 L) → vortex self-cleaning filter → underground tank → sediment filter (20 μm pre-filter + 5 μm final) → activated carbon → UV (40 mJ/cm²) → potable distribution

System autonomy: 100% in average years; mains-independent. In a dry year (10th percentile: 750 mm), annual yield = 132 m³ vs. 146 m³ demand — a 14 m³ shortfall. Emergency tankered water delivery for ~4 dry weeks.


8.8 System Autonomy Calculation

def system_autonomy(monthly_supply, monthly_demand, tank_capacity):
    """Calculate % of demand met by harvested water."""
    level = tank_capacity / 2  # start at half full
    total_demand = sum(monthly_demand)
    total_harvested = 0

    for s, d in zip(monthly_supply, monthly_demand):
        level = min(level + s, tank_capacity)
        drawn = min(level, d)
        total_harvested += drawn
        level -= drawn

    return 100 * total_harvested / total_demand

Summary


Previous: Chapter 7 — Greywater Recycling Systems

Next: Chapter 9 — The Numbers: Sizing Worksheets

Back to Table of Contents